Does Simple Faith Alone in Jesus Christ Really Save? Checklist Evangelists would say, "No!"

The Duluthian Antagonists and Checklist Evangelists believe that saving faith is assent to a complex series of propositions, containing multiple objects of faith, and is the result of a series of steps. Simple faith in Jesus through His promise is insufficient to save. Imagine Jesus Christ throwing into hell people who trusted in Him alone for salvation but failed to assent to the complexities and added steps that the Checklist Evangelists impose upon saving faith. Jesus would then be telling a lie when he said, "Most assuredly I say to you, whoever believes in Me has everlasting life" (John 6:47). Apparently, according to the Duluthian Antagonists, one can believe in Jesus for eternal life but fail to receive it for lack of assent to their critical and crucial orthodox doctrines. Would Jesus throw people into hell who had a certian hope and complete reliance upon Him through His promise to give eternal life to all who believe in Him for it? Imagine someone considering Jesus to be their absolute Savior and only hope of eternal well-being, but being cast into the lake of fire because they did not assent to the front-loading of the gospel with an array of doctrinal stipulations imposed upon them by the 'fundies'?

Example:

Let us say that I believe Jesus:

1) Was born in Bethlehem
2) Mother's name was Mary
3) Was tempted by Satan
4) Walked on water
5) Healed the sick
6) Gave sight to a blind man who had been blind from birth
7) Turned water into wine
8) Cast out demons
9) Raised Lazarus from the dead
10) said to an adulteress caught in the act, "Neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more"
11) was of the tribe of Judah
12) was of the line of David

AND I believed His promise:

"Most assuredly I say to you, whosoever believes in Me has eternal life."

In other words, I believe that the Jesus who did these things is the Christ, and my Savior, and that through faith alone in Him I have eternal life. YET I do not know and/or understand He is God, for instance (you could read in here any one of their multiple objects of faith, such as Christ's humanity, the substitutionary death, and resurrection).

The Duluthian Antagonists and Checklist Evangelists would believe me unsaved and on my way to hell because I have misplaced faith. I am believing in 'another' Jesus. Such an argument is baseless (I barely know much about many of my readers, but I surely can reference you by using what little unique things I know about you, apart from any of the grander and fuller elements of your personality, character, position, etc.).

Have we not sufficiently delimited the Jesus who is referenced in the above 12 ways to none other than the Jesus of the gospels?

Of course we have.

But the Duluthian Antagonists and Checklist Evangelists insist upon additional theological requirements, ones which neither Jesus nor John required. Their arguments haven't been based upon a biblical requirement mandating one believe that Jesus is fully God, equal to the Father in every respect, for no such commandment or requirement exists. Their arguments have often been framed by the idea that without Jesus' deity assented to our faith will inevitably be misplaced into some ethereal, figment of our imaginations, in other words, some 'other' Jesus. This reasoning is flawed for 2 reasons:

1) Jesus was believed in for eternal life apart from His deity being understood.

2) Many other unique references to Jesus can delimit our referencing of Him to the Historic Jesus who did make a promise guaranteeing eternal life to all who simply believe He has done so.

Antonio